Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a 79.7 score against 72.6. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has newer 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. Even though Moto G Stylus and realme X3 SuperZoom were released with only a couple of months difference, the Moto G Stylus design is a little lighter but just a little thicker.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little sharper display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit better pixel amount per inch in the display and a quite larger screen.
The realme X3 SuperZoom captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.