Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gray and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is a bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a score of 79.8 against 72.6. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Moto Z4's body is lighter and thinner than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released just 12 months before. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display.
The Moto Z4 features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z4 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The realme X3 SuperZoom captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger back camera sensor and a much more MP camera.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z4 costs more than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.