Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 399 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 general score. Galaxy A32 is an a bit thicker and a little heavier device than the realme X3 SuperZoom. The Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 operating system.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a little bigger display.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and better 60 fps video frame rates. Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 features better battery duration than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.