Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is much better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting a global score of 82.3 against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10. The Galaxy A60 design is thinner and lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released a bit more over a year before.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A60 has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the realme X3 SuperZoom, both of them have the same internal memory.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a lot larger camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.