Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's overall score of 72.6. Although Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than the realme X3 SuperZoom, it's body is lighter and thinner. Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a little larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a very superior camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.