Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is way better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. Although Galaxy A71 5G and the realme X3 SuperZoom were only released 1 months apart, Galaxy A71 5G is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a quite better amount of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior storage for games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little longer battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video definition, a back camera with a 64 MP and a same size camera sensor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a little more money than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.