Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 Star is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having an 82.1 score against 72.6. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A8 Star has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features. The Galaxy A8 Star is an older phone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has more RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit greater display pixel density.
Galaxy A8 Star has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 400 GB. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Realme X3 SuperZoom takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with faster video frame rate, a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.