Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's general score of 72.6. The Galaxy A80 is an older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A80. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, faster video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy A80 features as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The realme X3 SuperZoom has a little better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.