Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with an 81 score against 72.6. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features. Galaxy C9 Pro is an incredibly older device than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Samsung made it just a little lighter and noticeably thinner.
The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bigger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a lot higher resolution camera.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.