Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, getting an 83.3 score against 72.6. The Galaxy M30s body has the same thickness than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but it is just a bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy M30s has newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M30s has a very superior battery lifetime than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.