Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a global score of 86.5 against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy M31 is a just a bit lighter device than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both of them have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, providing some extra features.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M31 has a bit sharper display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, a 0.59 inches camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has better video frame rate. The Galaxy M31 features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M31 has a way better battery performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.