Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 365.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom, having a 79.5 score against 72.6. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Note 3 body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom, even though it was released 7 years before.
The realme X3 SuperZoom has a bit better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The realme X3 SuperZoom shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a much bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, higher 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a way higher resolution camera.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Realme X3 SuperZoom features better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 31 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest one, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.