Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ1 is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, having a 78.3 score against 72.6. Xperia XZ1 is an way older cellphone than the realme X3 SuperZoom, but Sony could make it lighter and thinner anyway. Xperia XZ1 counts with a screen that is very similar to the realme X3 SuperZoom one, because although the Xperia XZ1 has a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
The realme X3 SuperZoom features a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom captures much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, faster video frame rates, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Xperia XZ1 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The realme X3 SuperZoom features a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as realme X3 SuperZoom. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the realme X3 SuperZoom, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.