Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a 77.8 score against 72.6. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is a lot newer and notably thinner, but also a little heavier than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features and improved performance.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture, a much larger sensor and a much higher video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than realme X3 SuperZoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as realme X3 SuperZoom. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some dollars and buy the realme X3 SuperZoom, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.