Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's score of 72.6. The vivo X60 Pro body is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than realme X3 SuperZoom. These devices work with Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro and realme X3 SuperZoom count with similar screens, and although the vivo X60 Pro has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a little worse pixels density, they both have a screen of the same size.
Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro's battery life is just as good as realme X3 SuperZoom's battery lifetime. The realme X3 SuperZoom captures clearer photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.