Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 global score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 5s has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10 version. Xiaomi Mi 5s is an extremely older phone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but Xiaomi managed to build it just a little bit thinner and extremely lighter anyway.
Realme X3 SuperZoom features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 5s has a little bit better display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels number in each inch in the screen.
Realme X3 SuperZoom captures greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a camera in the back with much more MP, a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as the realme X3 SuperZoom one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The realme X3 SuperZoom features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 31% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 5s not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.