Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 380.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the realme X3 SuperZoom, with a global score of 85.5 against 72.6. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lighter cellphone than realme X3 SuperZoom, but both have the same thickness. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little more vivid display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count per display inch. The realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a bigger aperture and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 128 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a bit more than realme X3 SuperZoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.