Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the realme X50 5G, having a general score of 87.1 against 73. Samsung Galaxy Note9's construction has the same thickness than the realme X50 5G, but it is a little lighter. The realme X50 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Note9 both feature similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit better screen than realme X50 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The realme X50 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in low-light environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X50 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a superior storage for games and applications than realme X50 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X50 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.