Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the realme X50 5G, getting a 77.8 score against 73. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is incredibly newer and way thinner than the realme X50 5G's, but it is a little bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version and realme X50 5G has Android 10, giving you some extra features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than realme X50 5G, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bit greater pixels density and a bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 5G, because it has more internal memory.
The realme X50 5G features a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than realme X50 5G, because it has a bigger aperture, a back camera with a higher resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery performance than realme X50 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.