Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ice silver and Jungle green | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the realme X50 5G's 73 score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a somewhat lighter phone than realme X50 5G, but both are 0.35inches thick. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little more vivid display than realme X50 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in realme X50 5G, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Realme X50 5G has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X50 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better low light photos.
Realme X50 5G has just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.