Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, with an 85 score against 74.9. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone 8 is notably older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's design is notably lighter and thinner. The Apple iPhone 8 has a little faster processing unit than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 2 less and slower processing cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a much bigger screen, much more brightness and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The iPhone 8 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much better videos and photos than iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a much longer battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 131 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.