Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having an 84.5 score against 74.9. Even though the iPhone XS Max is older and a little heavier than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is still thinner. The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a bit smaller display, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with much more brightness. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with greater battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.