Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. Google Nexus 6P's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a very superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Google Nexus 6P and realme X50 Pro 5G both have incredibly similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with improved battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.