Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Although the Google Pixel XL is much older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is just a little thinner and lighter. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Google Pixel XL and realme X50 Pro 5G feature extremely similar memory for applications and games, both of them have equal internal memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.