Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should provide all the same operating system features. LG V50 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released just 10 months before.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower screen pixel density and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a same size display. LG V50 ThinQ's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in realme X50 Pro 5G, both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit superior battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.