Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction is somewhat lighter than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is incredibly thicker and was released 5 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Droid Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little more vivid display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.