Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a 77.9 score against 74.9. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is older and a lot thicker than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is still lighter. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Motorola DROID Turbo has a slightly better display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better display density.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has better 30 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.