Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some additional features. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is noticeably newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the realme X50 Pro 5G.
Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit better looking display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has much more brightness, a little bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 counts with superior battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.