Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a score of 79.7 against 74.9. Motorola Moto G Stylus's design is just a bit lighter but a little bit thicker than realme X50 Pro 5G, and they were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has a more recent 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.