Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. The Motorola Moto Z4 is an older phone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a better screen than Moto Z4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto Z4 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z4 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.