Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 10 operating system, so both should count with the same OS features. The Samsung Galaxy A12 has the same thickness and weight than realme X50 Pro 5G.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a lot better display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A12 has superior battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.