Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy A32's design weights the same than realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 operating system.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 has longer battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.