Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's score of 74.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is thinner and lighter. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018). Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a brighter screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same quantity of pixels per screen inch, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more MP and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 27 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.