Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a global score of 91.8 against 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a a bit lighter and just a bit thinner device than realme X50 Pro 5G, although both of them were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both have a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture, a 0.59 inches camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.