Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 Star has a general score of 82.1, which is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 general score. Galaxy A8 Star's body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, even though it was released just 19 months before. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A8 Star has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit better pixels number per screen inch.
The Galaxy A8 Star features a better memory capacity for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 14% more battery size.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.