Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having an 84.9 score against 74.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, we must highlight that it's also older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a little higher display density.
Realme X50 Pro 5G and Galaxy A80 both count with similar memory to install games and applications, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Realme X50 Pro 5G takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.