Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a global score of 81 against 74.9. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is thinner and just a little lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, even though it was released 3 years before. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better pixels quantity per display inch, a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.