Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with an 83.3 score against 74.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, offering some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy M30s body has the same thickness than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it is just a little bit lighter.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The Galaxy M30s features a bigger storage for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a very superior battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.