Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having an 86.5 score against 74.9. These devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it counts with lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy M31's construction has the same thickness than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's just a bit lighter.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little better performance than Galaxy M31. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a little bit better pixel density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and way more brightness.
The Galaxy M31 features a camera that's very similar to the realme X50 Pro 5G one, they have a same size back camera sensor, a F1.8 aperture, a camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition. The Galaxy M31 features a greater memory to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M31 has a way better battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.