Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. Although the Galaxy S6 edge+ is incredibly older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is much lighter and extremely thinner.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a slightly better display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixel number per inch of screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.