Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and thinner phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it's just a bit heavier. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a way brighter screen, a bigger screen, a quite greater pixel number in each inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 36% larger battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.