Compare phones
Samsung Ativ S
16 GBI8750
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 71.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android |
| 2012-08-29 | 2020-06-18 |
| 5.40 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.03 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Carbon gray, Ocean green and Sunset purple |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 189.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 9 is just a bit better than Samsung Ativ S, getting a 71.3 score against 65. The Xiaomi Redmi 9 counts with Android OS, and Samsung Ativ S works with Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS. Xiaomi Redmi 9's body is a lot newer, but just a bit thicker and a lot heavier than the Samsung Ativ S.
The Samsung Ativ S counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9, although it has a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a much smaller display and a quite worse display density. Samsung Ativ S counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9, because although it has just 16 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi 9 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Ativ S, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster). The Xiaomi Redmi 9 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Ativ S, because it has a 118 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9 features a bit better camera than Samsung Ativ S, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9 also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.