Compare phones
Samsung Ativ S
16 GBI8750
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android 10 |
| 2012-08-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.40 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way better than Samsung Ativ S, having a global score of 81.1 against 65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro comes with Android 10 OS, and Samsung Ativ S comes with Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a extremely newer phone than the Samsung Ativ S, but it's just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior hardware performance than Samsung Ativ S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Ativ S has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a way smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Ativ S, because it has a way better (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with way more MP. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Ativ S, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Ativ S, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a little more money than the Samsung Ativ S, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.