Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 3.78 x 1.89 x 0.75 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a lot better than the Samsung Chrono 2, with a global score of 76.4 against 35.8. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a noticeably thinner but notably heavier phone than the Samsung Chrono 2. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Chrono 2, because it has a really larger display, a much higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a very superior CPU than Samsung Chrono 2, because it has an extra GPU and a higher number of faster cores. The Motorola Droid Turbo takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Chrono 2, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution. Motorola Droid Turbo has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Chrono 2, although it has no SD memory card expansion slot.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Chrono 2, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 1000mAh.
The Motorola Droid Turbo costs a bit more than Samsung Chrono 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.