Search


Compare phones

Samsung E2370

GT-E2370

Samsung Star

GT-S5230
Global Score
3538.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2010-02-142009-03-10
4.41 x 1.93 x 0.75 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
4.06 ounces3.25 ounces
$ 139.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches3 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.45.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
5,12 MB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.640.4
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
3.635.39
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
2000mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
1040 hours standby time
20 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
3.922.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Samsung Star has a score of 38.4, which is a bit better than Samsung E2370's 35 score. The Samsung Star is an older device than the Samsung E2370, but Samsung could make it incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Star has a slightly better looking display than Samsung E2370, because it has a better display density, a really bigger display and a much better resolution of 400 x 240 pixels.

The Samsung E2370 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Star, although it has only 5,12 MB internal storage. Samsung Star and Samsung E2370 both have quite similar processing units, both have 0 CPU cores. The Samsung E2370 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Star, because it has 2000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1000mAh.

The Samsung Star has a lot better camera than Samsung E2370, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Star is also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.