Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-06-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.90 x 2.54 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than the Samsung Epic 4G, getting an 80.7 score against 53.9. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is a lot newer and much thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Epic 4G. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a more vivid screen than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a much larger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a way better pixels number per inch of display.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Epic 4G, although it has no SD memory slot. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior processor than Samsung Epic 4G, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a much better 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video definition. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.