Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-06-28 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.90 x 2.54 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than Samsung Epic 4G, getting an 83.8 score against 53.9. Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer and notably thinner device than Samsung Epic 4G, although it is a little heavier. The Galaxy A50 has an extremely better processor than Samsung Epic 4G, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 7 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a much larger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a lot higher display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A50 captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP and a lot better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality.
Galaxy A50 features a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a 167% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than Samsung Epic 4G, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.