Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A01, getting an 84.9 score against 71.6. Even though iPhone 11 Pro and Galaxy A01 were released with only a couple months difference, iPhone 11 Pro's body is a little thinner but also somewhat heavier. IPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A01 has Android 11 OS.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy A01, because although it has 2 less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM. IPhone 11 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way higher pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite bigger display.
IPhone 11 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A01 features slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has just 16 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 3046mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A01. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.