Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is much better than the Galaxy A01, getting a general score of 85 against 71.6. The Apple iPhone 8 design is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A01, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The iPhone 8 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 750 x 1334, it also counts with a little higher screen density.
The iPhone 8 counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy A01, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 8 also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 8 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A01 features a superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.