Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is much better than Galaxy A01, with a overall score of 84.5 against 71.6. IPhone XS Max is an older and much heavier cellphone than Galaxy A01, but Apple was able to make it just a little thinner anyway. The iPhone XS Max has a better processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A01, because it has a bit bigger display, a way better resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a much better pixel count per inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a bigger sensor and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A01 features just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 16 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.